Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • From Mirage to Wellspring
    • Surfacing Vulnerabilities, Mapping Governance Futures and Anticipating Policy Pathways
    • Metaphors for Reimagined Futures
    • Hope Theory for Alternative Futures
    • Urban-Rural Polarization in Canada
    • Confronting the Anti-Futures Triangle
    • Symposium: War, Genocide, and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • Foreword: Editorial Statement On the Necessity of Critique
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Consulting Editors
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 3 March 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 4 June 2026
      • 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 2 December 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 1 September 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 4 June 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Responsible & Ethical Use of AI
      • Notice of Publication Fee Implementation
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
        • War, Genocide and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • The Futures Studies Channel
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Perspectives»On Rethinking Fairy Tales
    Perspectives

    On Rethinking Fairy Tales

    August 16, 2018Updated:January 7, 20266 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    On 4th January, 2018, a 6-year old girl was raped and murdered in Qasur, Pakistan. This instance of child abuse  served as a wake up call for a society which has been lax in its response to abuse and has shaken the collective conscience of the Pakistani nation. While the issue is in the spotlight, it is important to look at it from various angles, instead of just skimming the issue at a superficial level. Child abuse relates to neglect, emotional abuse, physical abuse and sexual abuse of children.  In this regards I believe there is a need to explore the role of fairy tales which are an important medium of inspiring imagination for children and have facilitated the normalization of child abuse.

    For the past few decades, fairy tales have come under intense criticism for their underlying tones especially child abuse and neglect. Critics like Jack Zipes, Marina Warner and Maria Tatar have critiqued fairy tales, especially those of Brothers Grimm, which have normalized and overlooked child abuse in the name of a happy ending. They have also lamented at how these stories have socialized children to accept the abuse/neglect they suffer, without realizing it. So we have Cinderella (emotional abuse of a child by her stepmother and stepsisters), Rapunzel (sacrifice of a female child by her parents; imprisonment and mental abuse by a witch), Beauty and the Beast ( sacrifice of a female child to save the patriarch), Snow White (physical abuse which evolves into attempted murder), Hansel and Gretel (child neglect and abandon by parents, physical abuse and attempted murder by witch) and the Little Red Riding Hood (well established reputation of the wolf as a child predator), to name a few. Ironically, the endings also represent a harmony of the child with established notions of the adult world. Hansel and Gretel return to their parent, with treasures; a parent who had neglected and abandoned them and everybody is happy.

    When we cross over to the Urdu equivalent of these Western fairy tales, there is a similar pattern of child/female abuse, imprisonment and normalizing the unpleasant past in the name of ‘happily ever after’. So while characters and names change, a common theme in Urdu folklore for children would be the kidnapping of a beautiful princess by a sorcerer/king/villain and her ultimate release at the hands of a valiant prince/commoner. It is only recently that we hear new stories of brave and adventurous female characters which are a stark contrast to the beautiful, but passive princesses from traditional fairy tales. So stories like Burqa Avenger stand out as an anomaly but have yet to have a major domino effect on our literature focused on children. It is important to revisit these fairy tales with a focus on the initial abuse and remember how this abuse will be played down and forgotten by the happy endings of the fairy tale. At a time when our nation is in a soul searching mode over the Kasur incidents, now, more than ever, we need new tales to lead us through our troubling times.

    A knee jerk reaction would be to sanitize, censor and police folk lore.  Instead I believe that these fairy tales are still valuable today, even when they are targeted at a very young audience. Storytelling is a powerful and inexpensive method that can bring issues to consciousness if done constructively. If used sensibly, these fairy tales can be used for children to be informed of the dangers that lurk around them, and how to deal with them. Given the universal reception of storytelling to children, we can use fairy tales to instill values in them that would both enable them to be good members of society as well as survive in a violent and uncertain world.

    There is also a need to challenge the dominant discourse by reframing of inner stories, myths and metaphors and using fairy tales to address violence and colonial stereotypes. Futurists like Ivana Milojević, Sohail Inaytaullah and Aleksandra Izgarjan have worked extensively with teachers, librarians, and children on the deconstruction and reconstruction of fairytales and myths in war torn Serbia. In a country that is trying to come to terms with its recent violent past, their work with children indicates that many interesting versions of a single story can be created as a method of creating peace-oriented worldviews and promoting diversity. As an example of their work, a young woman challenges the norms and proves that female sacrifice is not needed by building a castle – she goes on to become a successful architect. In another story, a girl’s fairy godmother prevents her victimization and takes her to another country where she works on creating a safe and gender equal society.

    In my work with librarians and story letters in Pakistan, participants have come up with different versions of popular folk lore by questioning the assumptions behind the stories.

    • A participant of a story telling workshop, retold the story of the boy who cried wolf with the shepherd who cried for help when the wolf really attacked his herd. The assumption was that why do we need to spread the message of repeated lies, and turning society immune to cries of help, before learning a lesson. Why can’t we have the truth the first time around?
    • A female participant retold the story of Red Riding Hood especially the role of the grandmother who domesticates the wolf before Red Riding hood visits her.
    • One female participant questioned as to why we need to retell stories, if abuse is already prevalent in our society. Why don’t we use these fairy tales to instruct our kids about the dangers prevailing around them and how to tackle them? This is a policy directive which needs to be taken seriously and used to sensitize children and their caretakers on the dangers lurking around them.

    And finally we need to give our children the ‘right’ to change and reframe stories. We live in a society where there is no dearth of things which have been deemed sacred. If we want change to happen, then we will have to reframe deeply embedded social narratives. We could start this by situating folklore as something which can be meddled with. Children, with their innocence and exuberance, have an enormous reframing potential while telling a story and I have always been amazed at how remarkably children comment on reality. After all it was a young child who audaciously commented that the emperor has no clothes.

    Umar Sheraz is a futurist based in Pakistan and can be reached at usheraz@gmail.com. This blog originally appeared on Pak Tea House Blog and has been republished with permission. 

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    From Mirage to Wellspring

    July 23, 2026

    Surfacing Vulnerabilities, Mapping Governance Futures and Anticipating Policy Pathways

    July 23, 2026

    Hope Theory for Alternative Futures

    April 28, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • Applied Critical Futures Studies: Stance Before Method
    • Special Relativity Theory Expands the Futures Cone’s Conceptualisation of the Futures and The Pasts
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Jose Rizal: Precursor of Futures Thinking in the Philippines
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Articles by Topic
    • From Lazarus to Leviathan: A foresight analysis of North Korea's cyber operations and its implications
    • Liquid Retirement: Navigating Identity Fluidity in the Transition from Career to Post-Work Life
    • Learning Futures Studies Collaboratively
    In-Press

    Liquid Retirement: Navigating Identity Fluidity in the Transition from Career to Post-Work Life

    July 22, 2026

    Article Shu-Chin Fu1, Kuo-Hua Chen2,* 1 Department of Education and Future Design, Doctoral Program in…

    Imagination and Futures Studies in Education

    July 22, 2026

    Wastewater in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA): A Resource for Water, Energy and Food Security in 2030

    July 22, 2026

    Co-Creating the Future with AI: From Input to Ownership in Participative Scenario Generation

    July 22, 2026

    Intergenerational Adequacy and Humane Futures: A Capability–Conversion Architecture for Long-Term Justice

    July 4, 2026

    Applied Critical Futures Studies: Stance Before Method

    July 4, 2026

    Futures in Tension: Foresight and the Limits of Government Strategy in Latin America

    July 4, 2026

    Anticipating Ecuador’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Insights to 2040

    July 4, 2026

    Emotional States, Mental Imagery, and Scenario Workshop Outcomes: Implications for Futures Practice

    July 4, 2026

    From Lazarus to Leviathan: A foresight analysis of North Korea’s cyber operations and its implications

    June 29, 2026

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.