Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • From Wolves to Care Bears: Insights from the Caloundra Futures Thinking and Transformational Strategy Masterclass
    • JFS | Podcast
    • A Rocket to the Future – Futures Triangle for Children
    • Editors’ Introduction to Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future Symposium
    • Rebellious girls needed – the urgency to imagine more feminist futures
    • Feminist International Relations: a knowledge-based proposition
    • Mother, motherhood, mothering: A conversation on feminist futures across generations, cultures, and life experiences
    • Quantum Feminist Futures: Introducing the applied fusion of two theories
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Consulting Editors
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Duties of Authors
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
    • JFS Community of Practice
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Perspectives»Big space-time, values, and the next era of complexity
    Perspectives

    Big space-time, values, and the next era of complexity

    July 12, 20196 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

     

    When in April 2019 Notre-Dam in Paris was burning it was a very tragic and horrible incident to watch for me as a cosmopolitan. However, I also observed, as a resident in the Middle East, that despite breaking news coverage over the Western media, there were some other media channels that treated the incident not that much important because they and their audiences were remote both geographically and culturally from that context. They simply didn’t care.

    That made me wonder what humans value across the world over space-time and also if we should anticipate some significant change in this regard. More specifically, are there any relationships between the symbolic value of Notre-Dame Cathedral in the Western civilization and the possible application of futures studies? The answer might come not only from futures studies but also past studies, i.e. history.

    Fortunately, lately while working on my recent book titled: A Transformation Journey to Creative and Alternative Planetary Futures, I was immersed in some research on philosophical anthropology in particular related to mythology-theology, a formidable and vast field that you can spend your whole life and career studying its many variants over big space-time.

    One of the key references for me was a Persian language book written by Sherwin Vakili in 2015 on the Interpretation of Gathas (the original hymns by Zoroaster) also known as Zend commentaries on the texts of the Avesta. Zoroaster as a pioneer philosopher-prophet, has been credited to be a revolutionary thinker because he led his followers in the Airyanem Vaejah into a new era. As a matter of fact, a revolution of human consciousness happened by Zoroaster alone. He stood against the nomad people surrounding him, and led them like a healer into agriculture and settled civilization. He in particular challenged the then prevailing circular time of aimless repetitions of seasons in favor of a more linear and progressive time. His original saying in the book of Gathas depicts those who are against settlement, civilization, and prefer a nomadic life as liars, deceitful, and destroyers, whereas people who favor a progressive time conception as righteous, who build upon the past, improve the Earth, and move forward, they are followers of truth and Asha, the laws of nature.

    Vakili, in particular, demonstrates that the humanity has been following certain models or metaphors during different eras as it moved through history of successive mythology-theology.

    When there were nomad communities, the key characteristics of the gods where reflected in and associated with biology, family relations, mating of males and females, and delivering babies from parents. For example, Pangu in Chinese mythology, Orisis myth in ancient Egypt, or Zurvan and Brahma in Indo-Iranian mythologies. Back then creativity and complexity or god like powers were revered in life related phenomenon. They were immediate experiences of humans in day to day life.

    When that era ended and we saw the settlement, agriculture and industry, humans began to celebrate their gods in cities following another model, that is of buildings, a master of architecture or craftsmanship of pottery takes the role of representing the highest level of creativity and complexity and god like powers. For example, Third Temple in Jewish theology-mythology, Kaaba (House of Allah) in Islamic theology-mythology, or the Geush Tasha, the master fashioner, or architect of creation, of the Giti (the physical world), in Zoroastrian theology-mythology, and creation of man from clay in many different theology-mythology sets which appeared later. In brief the art of architecture, sculpture, etc links the humanity to the deities. Humans admire gods or desire to be like them or unite with them in such a glory. Therefore, giving enormous symbolic value to buildings and crafts in this era is used to define a timeless identity, of anything of symbolic value. The association of magnificent timeless buildings and the gods as architects or artisans during the era of human settlement as opposed to glorifying the gods based on the procreation power and blood relationships during the nomadic era is very strong.

    This makes me wonder what will happen next in the distant future when we enter through a combined cyclic-linear conception of time into the next level of creativity and complexity. Even if we do not believe in astrology like pre-modern societies influenced by mythology-theology, we could ask what will be god like powers in the next 2,000 years, which is nearly the duration of an astrological age, or even when one cycle of twelve ages of more than 25,000 years completes and the planetary consciousness shifts into the next era of complexity and creativity on the Earth and beyond it. When everything of value might be characterized not as related to buildings in settled communities but again to placeless and temporary things or even intangibles such as computer codes and algorithms.

    If the future generations will be always moving, enabled by cheap access to renewable energy everywhere, obviously not tied to oil wells, with less border restrictions by nationalist parties and less language barrier, and people can have jobs and lifestyles like a digital nomad or freelance with fluid identity as opposed to its binary of solid identity then what they might value, what could be the god like powers for them. Will their culture be defined on important permanent buildings and houses of gods? Will they stop giving much symbolic value to the gods as the architect or designer with a blueprint and begin instead exploring new territories of new theology-mythology informed by modern science and technology? Are we or our posterity prepared for a zeitgeist of revering placelessness and temporary things and stories in aesthetics and of anything of value to humanity? Aren’t the rising Algocracy and today users who post photos and videos that vanish after 24 hours on social media themselves a harbinger of a much dramatic change in the future. A possible range of answers to such questions could be worthwhile research agenda to explore.

     

    Reference:

    Vakili, Sherwin (2015) Zend of Gathas, pages 234-237:
    http://soshians.ir/fa/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Sherwin-Vakili-Zand-Gahan.pdf

    About the author:

    Victor V. Motti is a Middle East based senior adviser of strategic foresight and anticipation. He is also the Director of the World Futures Studies Federation. His new book A Transformation Journey to Creative and Alternative Planetary Futures was published in early 2019 in the UK.

     

     

     

     

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    admin

    Related Posts

    From Wolves to Care Bears: Insights from the Caloundra Futures Thinking and Transformational Strategy Masterclass

    April 22, 2025

    JFS | Podcast

    April 3, 2025

    A Rocket to the Future – Futures Triangle for Children

    March 11, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Homepage
    • Jose Rizal: Precursor of Futures Thinking in the Philippines
    • Regenerative Futures: Eight Principles for Thinking and Practice
    • Special Relativity Theory Expands the Futures Cone’s Conceptualisation of the Futures and The Pasts
    • Brain Computer Interfaces: A New Existential Risk Factor
    • The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?
    • Worldbuilding in Science Fiction, Foresight and Design
    • A Manifesto for Decolonising Design
    • Submission Guidelines
    In-Press

    Drama to Dharma and the Holographic Buddha: Futures Thinking in Thailand

    May 4, 2025

    Article Ivana Milojević1, Sohail Inayatullah2, Ora-orn Poocharoen3, Nok Boonmavichit4* 1Senior Lecturer in Futures, Edinburgh Futures…

    Codes of Tomorrow: Genomic Sequencing Futures in Mexico of 2035

    May 4, 2025

    The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?

    May 4, 2025

    Extreme Heat Governance Futures for Sydney – What Now, and What If?

    April 21, 2025

    Mama Coca Chronicles: Navigating Ancestral Heritage and Future Narratives

    April 21, 2025

    Parliaments and Foresight: Scanning and Reflections on Parliamentary Futures Work

    March 16, 2025

    Automating Liminality in Foresight Practice

    January 28, 2025

    Dis/abling Futures: What Ableism Stops Us Noticing

    January 28, 2025

    Beyond the Gaia-Borg Dichotomy: Imagining a Second Chance

    January 28, 2025

    Book Review: “The End of the Cow and Other Emerging Issues”

    January 28, 2025

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.