Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • From Wolves to Care Bears: Insights from the Caloundra Futures Thinking and Transformational Strategy Masterclass
    • JFS | Podcast
    • A Rocket to the Future – Futures Triangle for Children
    • Editors’ Introduction to Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future Symposium
    • Rebellious girls needed – the urgency to imagine more feminist futures
    • Feminist International Relations: a knowledge-based proposition
    • Mother, motherhood, mothering: A conversation on feminist futures across generations, cultures, and life experiences
    • Quantum Feminist Futures: Introducing the applied fusion of two theories
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Consulting Editors
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Duties of Authors
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
    • JFS Community of Practice
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Perspectives»GARMENT WORKERS TO WOMEN LEADERS AND THE WISE E-BUDDHA: CAMBODIA 2050
    Perspectives

    GARMENT WORKERS TO WOMEN LEADERS AND THE WISE E-BUDDHA: CAMBODIA 2050

    May 12, 2020Updated:May 13, 20208 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    UNSPLASH

    By Sohail Inayatullah, Sunniya Durrani-Jamal, and Sonia Chand Sandhu

    In late  2019, the Asian Development Bank (2020)[i] facilitated a Futures foresight workshop (Kanagaraj 2019) to map out complimentary pathways to the development of Cambodia’s vision 2030 (to become an upper middle income country) and eventually Vision 2050 (to become a middle income country). [ii] As it was a one day workshop, we focused on a variant of the Six Pillars process (Inayatullah, 2015) using  in particular Causal Layered Analysis, Scenarios, Visioning and Backcasting.  The intent was to enhance futures literacy in the nation and  articulate areas that the Asian Development Bank and the government of Cambodia could work together. While there were numerous research areas, the role of women, technology, and economic diversity stood out.

    https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/countries/cambodia

     WOMEN AND THE FUTURE

    Given that currently there are 94 men to every 100 women in the country, in terms of growth can women go from being garment manufacturing workers to 50% of executives in government and business? Executives from the Cambodia government asked this and other questions not only for reasons of equity, but also for optimization. They knew that Cambodia could not become a wealthy nation, an efficient nation, a fairer nation unless females rose to the ranks of leadership. Current research, including from the IMF certainly supports this.[1] Moreover, we know from data on start-ups  (Council 2015)  and financial firms that females on the whole perform better than their male counterparts.[iii] Whether this is because they can manage the economy better in turbulent times or because they are more cautious it is not clear. We do, however, know that gender equity is a pre-requisite to a prosperous society. To shift Cambodia, to make the change, first the future needs to be imagined. Thus, the image of the future was that of a woman leader leading a political rally of men and women in contrast to a man overseeing a factory filled with female garment workers This is contrast to today where the main KPI is number of shirts produced.

    Table : Women’s Leadership in Cambodia

    Litany or description Shirts produced per day Number of women in leadership
    The System Rules-based, low status Diverse work opportunities

    Political and social empowerment

    The Worldview Industrial economy Knowledge economy
    The Metaphor Garment worker = a woman Leader = a woman

     

    Diversity of gender roles was not the only issue that they saw changing in the decades ahead if Vision 2030 was to be achieved.  The economy needed to diversify, knowledge innovation was necessary, and governance needed to transform through transparency and technology.  Indeed, they saw these changes as working together to create a possible transformation towards a  Digital Economy.

    The person behind the idea of 2050 Vision. Dr. Mey Kalayan, Senior Advisor, Supreme National Economic Council, and Chairman, Royal University of Phnom Penh. Picture by Sohail Inayatullah.

    E-MONK TO THE E-BUDDHA

    While the foresight workshop was conducted in English, the metaphors that were used to describe the change were localized. For example, participants imagined the new governance system as E-Buddha – that is a system that was for the good of all. The current information technology system in Cambodia was considered complicated, paper-based and for the good of the local organization. It was like a room full of monks and nuns. In the e-Buddha world, administrative processes would serve the nation, be paperless and easy to use. They would need to be on open platforms, allowing different systems to access and change the parameters.

    This would be quite a shift from the current system, which was more like a c-drive, private and divided by silos.

    Litany description Complicated Simple and efficient
    The System Paper and C-drive Paperless with an open platform
    The Worldview For the government department For the Nation
    Metaphor E-Monk E-Buddha

     

    Chhy Vichara, Under Secretary of State of Ministry of Civil Service. Imagining an alternative future for women and men in Cambodia. Picture by Sohail Inayatullah.

    The E-Buddha system would be wise, helping all Cambodians, making everyone’s life easier. But to what avail? How would the new administrative and technological system change the nation? In the view of participants, new information and communication technologies would assist in the transition to a more effective system. The technology is already present with 98.5% of the population using the Internet or around 15.8 million people.[iv] Facebook alone has seven million users. The bureaucracy, while active users of Facebook for communication, in particular, needed to transform services, using new technologies to decentralize.

    https://www.pinterest.com.au/pin/338544096963959795/

    ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION

    But it was not just the administrative sector that needed to change, the economy also needed to shift from being city and manufacturing-based to becoming far more diversified. Citizens too needed to  be trained for the technological disruptions ahead – soft and hard skills. Foreign investment was needed so the economy could move from being a tree that was giving fruit to an entire forest with multiple industries.

    Chhe Lidin, Director General , Ministry of Mines and Energy. Picture by Sohail Inayatullah
    Litany City-based Decentralized
    The System Manufacturers Many industries, so as to attract investors
    The Worldview Poverty reduction Wealth creation
    Metaphor Tree Forest

     

    Participants felt if woman were empowered, governance became decentralized, paperless, far more efficient – whole of government, citizen and business – than it could help Cambodia truly transform, moving from a hopping frog to a leaping tiger.

    MAKING THE VISION REAL

    But for this vision to occur, used futures (Inayatullah 2008) needed to be challenged. These are strategies that no longer work, but we continue them.  Participants asserted that the main used future was the Cambodian mind-set. It was reactive, rigid, formal, and risk-averse.  It was this historical weight that would not allow innovation that could enhance well-being and prosperity. This was especially so given how new technologies were challenging traditional knowledge and bureaucratic structures.

    As one group suggested, “we want a smart governance system that is open and sustainable, has on-line public services has a great ITC infrastructure, and ensures excellent communication between the government and citizens and government and the private sector.

    But how to get there? Using the methodology of backcasting wherein the future is imagined and then steps to realize this future articulated, participants recommended the following.

    • By 2023, there is a Minister for ICT
    • By 2025, near full literacy in the nation
    • By 2025, a nationwide ICT infrastructure system
    • By 2026, a system to evaluate what is working and not working in e-governance
    • By 2027 a fully functioning agile cyber-security system
    • By 2028, cost savings from the ICT revolution are visible
    • By 2029, enhanced gender equity, possible as work ICTs are not gender-based
    • By 2030, with a decade of data collection, the beginning of evidence-based policymaking.
    • By 2030, Cambodia receives an award for e-government
    • By 2035, women are visible leaders in Cambodia
    EMBODIED BACKCASTING. Picture by Sohail Inayatullah

    The backcast showed that the drivers creating a different future were education, information and communication technologies in governance, and the empowerment of women. Each factor/driver works with the other drivers synergistically creating a new Cambodia. Investment in these areas as well as anticipating action learning projects in these areas needed to be prioritized.

    CONCLUSION

    While with some groups, variation and outliers are most important, with this group of senior leaders gaining convergence on the vision was critical. The backcast, in particular, helped make futures a practical exercise.  Overall, the futures process helped break silos and create a shared vision. Next steps include funding participation action research projects with ADB grants as well as ensuring that futures thinking becomes a formal part of public sector knowledge coursework.

     

    Authors Sonia Chand Sandhu, Sohail Inayatullah, and Sunniya Durrani-Jamal

    About the Authors

    Sonia Chand Sandhu is an environmental engineer, urban resilience and sustainable development specialist with the Sustainable Development and Climate Change Department. at the Asian Development Bank

    Sunniya Durrani-Jamal is the Country Director of the Cambodia Resident Mission of the Asian Development Bank

    Dr. Sohail Inayatullah is the UNESCO Chair in Futures Studies, at USIM, Professor at Tamkang University, Taiwan and Associate Professor, Melbourne Business School, the University of Melbourne.

    REFERENCES

    Asia Development Bank. 2020. Futures thinking in Asia and the Pacific. Why Foresight Matters for Policymakers. Manila: Asia Development Bank.

    Council J.  2015. Research shows benefit of women in startup management teams. IBJ. https://www.ibj.com/articles/55357-research-shows-benefit-of-women-in-startup-management-teams. Accessed 27 April 2020.

    Inayatullah, S. 2008. Six Pillars: Futures Thinking for Transformation. Foresight. Vol. 10, No. 1), 4-28.

    Inayatullah, S. 2015. What Works: Case Studies in the Practice of Foresight. Tamsui: Tamkang.

    Kanagaraj, P. 2019. ADB hosts future learning workshop. Khmer Times. 24 September 2019.

    https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50645768/adb-hosts-future-learning-worksh. Accessed 30 April 2020.

    [1] IMF. 2019. Finance and Development – Women and Growth. Washington. D.C.

    [i]. Dr. Susann Roth was the lead editor for this text. She works in the area of innovation at knowledge management at the Bank.

    [ii] https://www.khmertimeskh.com/608573/cambodias-development-vision-for-a-progressive-inclusive-and-sustainable-society/.Accessed 27 April 2020.

    [iii]  https://www.creditsimple.com.au/content/Credit_Simple_AU_State_of_the_Nation_Oct2019.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2020.

    [iv] https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/1719527/internet-users-in-cambodia-near-16m. Accessed 27 November 2019.

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    admin

    Related Posts

    From Wolves to Care Bears: Insights from the Caloundra Futures Thinking and Transformational Strategy Masterclass

    April 22, 2025

    JFS | Podcast

    April 3, 2025

    A Rocket to the Future – Futures Triangle for Children

    March 11, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Drama to Dharma and the Holographic Buddha: Futures Thinking in Thailand
    • Choosing your Energy Adventure
    • Articles and Essays
    • The Future of Strategic Decision-Making
    • Jose Rizal: Precursor of Futures Thinking in the Philippines
    • The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?
    • Dis/abling Futures: What Ableism Stops Us Noticing
    • A Manifesto for Decolonising Design
    In-Press

    Drama to Dharma and the Holographic Buddha: Futures Thinking in Thailand

    May 4, 2025

    Article Ivana Milojević1, Sohail Inayatullah2, Ora-orn Poocharoen3, Nok Boonmavichit4* 1Senior Lecturer in Futures, Edinburgh Futures…

    Codes of Tomorrow: Genomic Sequencing Futures in Mexico of 2035

    May 4, 2025

    The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?

    May 4, 2025

    Extreme Heat Governance Futures for Sydney – What Now, and What If?

    April 21, 2025

    Mama Coca Chronicles: Navigating Ancestral Heritage and Future Narratives

    April 21, 2025

    Parliaments and Foresight: Scanning and Reflections on Parliamentary Futures Work

    March 16, 2025

    Automating Liminality in Foresight Practice

    January 28, 2025

    Dis/abling Futures: What Ableism Stops Us Noticing

    January 28, 2025

    Beyond the Gaia-Borg Dichotomy: Imagining a Second Chance

    January 28, 2025

    Book Review: “The End of the Cow and Other Emerging Issues”

    January 28, 2025

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.