Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • From Wolves to Care Bears: Insights from the Caloundra Futures Thinking and Transformational Strategy Masterclass
    • JFS | Podcast
    • A Rocket to the Future – Futures Triangle for Children
    • Editors’ Introduction to Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future Symposium
    • Rebellious girls needed – the urgency to imagine more feminist futures
    • Feminist International Relations: a knowledge-based proposition
    • Mother, motherhood, mothering: A conversation on feminist futures across generations, cultures, and life experiences
    • Quantum Feminist Futures: Introducing the applied fusion of two theories
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Consulting Editors
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Duties of Authors
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
    • JFS Community of Practice
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Articles and Essays»2018»A Review of Leonardo Caffo and Azzurra Muzzonigro’s “Costruire Futuri: Migrazioni, Città, Immaginazioni”

    A Review of Leonardo Caffo and Azzurra Muzzonigro’s “Costruire Futuri: Migrazioni, Città, Immaginazioni”

    View PDF

    Journal of Futures Studies, December 2018, 23(2): 101–103

    DOI:10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0007

    B O O K R E V I E W

    A Review of Leonardo Caffo and Azzurra Muzzonigro’s “Costruire Futuri: Migrazioni, Città, Immaginazioni”

    Steven Umbrello, Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies Italy

    Modernism has provided a strong case for technoprogressivism, innovation and speculation on future possibilities. However, drastic and often devastating consequences have followed modernism such as global warming and mass biodiversity loss. In Leonardo Caffo and Azzurra Muzzonigro’s new book1, a case for posthumanism as a means for envisioning and rethinking futures studies is argued and practical means by which those futures can be realized are outlined.

    A critique of modernity and grand narratives of unification, Caffo and Muzzonigro aim to reevaluate contemporaneity to imagine more authentic futures and the means by which peoples can realize them. At its core, Costruire Futuri (literally, Constructing Futures) is a prototypical work in posthumanist ethics, but anything but prototypical in its execution.

    The authors contend that the hybridization between the disciplines of philosophy, art and architecture are essential engines for change. Similarly, the book itself is constructed as a hybrid project rather than one of simple interdisciplinarity, one that hybridizes the three disciplines as co-constituting one another. The central thesis here is that constructing futures means correcting past errors as if they are causes rather than mere consequences. The past is alive, embodied and continually transforming current and future practices. Similarly, envisioned futures shape the present and affect the hermeneutics of the past.

    Caffo and Muzzonigro argue that the ecological crisis of the twenty-first century necessitates a re- envisioning of how distant groups and cultures can come into a ‘third space,’ one that is created to motivate a dialogue that is explicit, public and accessible.

    The book is constructed in an unorthodox approach. Composed of only 107 pages of actual text (excluding the table of contents which is located at the back of the book, and the bibliography), the book is divided into three distinct parts. The core of the book (85 pages long) is the authors’ explication and argument for their posthumanist hybridization of the three disciplines. It is here that they draw on the work of three scholars:

    1. Stefano Boeri (architect), 2) Amos Gitai (actor and architect) and 3) Adrian Paci (sculptor and artist). The theories and work from the three are employed as the philosophical axis from which the authors’ make their argument for the necessity of the hybridization of the three disciplines as a means by which desirable futures can be imagined and constructed.

    The second part of the book titled “Constructing Futures: A Manifesto in 10 Points” (my translation) runs only five pages and acts as a sort of pointed summary of the first part of the book. The third and final part is a transcribed and translated (from English into Italian) dialogue between the three scholars and is covered in eleven pages.

    The book, although remarkably short, is well-researched and philosophically rigorous, something that is not always seen within the scholarship and literature that constitute the posthumanities. Similarly, the book draws on much of the recent and relevant literature such as Haraway (2016), Morton (2007, 2016) and Singer (2016) to name a few. There is much to endorse this book, but above all is its lack of obtuseness and purposeful obscurantism that has and is characteristic of much of the posthumanist corpus.

    The only fault with this text, if it can be characterized as such, is the inability for it to be widely disseminated given that it is currently printed only in its original language of Italian. However, given the strength of its thesis, the implications that it enrolls and the novelty of its composition makes an obvious case for its translation. To this end, it seems prudent that a review such as this, given the book’s exclusivity, give at least a rudimentary outline of the ten points given that it succinctly and explicitly captures the thesis:

      1. Constructing futures requires a body-based ethics for anticipation, and as a site for understanding identity and relations with others is necessary for envisioning futures.2
      2. Constructing futures means that there is no privileged central position. The margins, the peripheries of disciplines, peoples and forms of life are shared and common spaces where hybridization can take shape.
      3. Constructing futures entails both the distinction and connection of various forms of life. Realizing differences and heterogeneity is necessary for potent hybridization. Rather than totalize, oppress, or erase differences, we should envision the hybridization space as a porous membrane that allows for differing connections while affirming distinctness between entities.
      4. Constructing futures means that groups must always remain open to the most substantial amount of future possibilities to permit transformations to develop. This entails a type of control of possibilities, but without dominance. This means that control should be limited as per point (1), respecting the boundaries of the bodies of other forms of life.
      5. Constructing futures means the development of shared time, space and tools for the distribution of agency, knowledge, practices and means of production. A collective intelligence is advocated that is less vertical and hierarchical, but horizontal and shared.
      6. Constructing future means making room for models of relationships, management and production based on activation/kinetic engagement. Multiplicity becomes wealth when everyone has the possibility to trigger processes of transformation. This entails the expungement of superiority, unification and egocentrism.
      7. Constructing futures means the shift from metaphysics to ecology. The ecological thought (see also Morton 2012) means the abandonment of the metaphysical ideal of the individual towards the concept of relations between entities as fundamentally constructive of their identities.
      8. Constructing futures means the abandonment of anthropocentrism, shifting away from the privileged place that humanistic and modernist philosophy has placed humans and towards an understanding of a plurality of phenomenologies that exist regardless of the categories that we impose on them. This abandonment is the starting place for alliances to be formed between different forms of life.
      9. Constructing futures means to look at the limits of the projects and actions undertaken in the past. This means looking at the changes to the structure of our actions rather than just the details of the actions themselves.
      10. Constructing futures means aiming at peace. This is the conditions of the animal that is fully seated, still and fully present to themselves. This requires an understanding of phenomenological differences and the lack of pure isolation, but instead of interconnected enmeshments with all things.

    In sum, Costruire Futuri is a markedly unique text. Composed of various stylistic parts, salted with beautiful art pieces to refer to during the narrative arguments and the clarity of its execution makes this text a pivotal reference to humanities scholars generally. Although in its current language it remains hard to access and disseminate, the value of the book itself makes its translation imperative and assured in the near future.

    Correspondence

    Steven Umbrello

    Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies

    Postal Address: Via San Massimo 4. 10123, Turin, Italy Telephone: +393518238010

    E-mail Address: steve@ieet.org ORCID: 0000-0003-2594-6313

    Notes

    1. Costruire Futuri: Migrazioni, città, immaginazioni – Con un dialogo tra Stefano Boeri, Amos Gitai e Adrian Paci by Leonardo Caffo and Azzurra Muzzonigro, Bompani/Giunti Editore, Firenze, 2018, 128 pp., € 11.00 (Paperback), ISBN 9788845295782.(Constructing Futures: Migrations, Cities, Imaginations – with a dialogue between Stefano Boeri, Amos Gitai e Adrian Paci.)
    2. The body-based ethics that constitutes the crux of the thesis, and point 1 specifically, are extrapolations and re-tooling’s from the work of Judith Butler (1993)
    3. All page references are to Caffo, L., & Muzzonigro, A. (2018). Costruire futuri: Migrazioni, città, immaginazioni – Con un dialogo tra Stefano Boeri, Amos Gitai e Adrian Paci. Firenze: Bompiani/ Giunti Editore. Retrieved from http://www.giunti.it/libri/saggistica/costruire-futuri/

    References

    Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “sex.” New York, NY: Routledge. Caffo, L., & Muzzonigro, A. (2018). Costruire futuri: Migrazioni, città, immaginazioni. Giunti.

    Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://www.dukeupress.edu/staying-with-the-trouble

    Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA 2009: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog. php?isbn=9780674034853

    Morton, T. (2012). The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674064225

    Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Choosing your Energy Adventure
    • Ukraine War and Historical War Cycles: Was It to Be Expected? Exploring The Futures of The War In Ukraine Through Historical War Cycles
    • Jose Rizal: Precursor of Futures Thinking in the Philippines
    • Drama to Dharma and the Holographic Buddha: Futures Thinking in Thailand
    • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
    • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
    • Articles and Essays
    • The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?
    In-Press

    Drama to Dharma and the Holographic Buddha: Futures Thinking in Thailand

    May 4, 2025

    Article Ivana Milojević1, Sohail Inayatullah2, Ora-orn Poocharoen3, Nok Boonmavichit4* 1Senior Lecturer in Futures, Edinburgh Futures…

    Codes of Tomorrow: Genomic Sequencing Futures in Mexico of 2035

    May 4, 2025

    The Tale of Three Futures: Conquest, Reverence or Reconciliation?

    May 4, 2025

    Extreme Heat Governance Futures for Sydney – What Now, and What If?

    April 21, 2025

    Mama Coca Chronicles: Navigating Ancestral Heritage and Future Narratives

    April 21, 2025

    Parliaments and Foresight: Scanning and Reflections on Parliamentary Futures Work

    March 16, 2025

    Automating Liminality in Foresight Practice

    January 28, 2025

    Dis/abling Futures: What Ableism Stops Us Noticing

    January 28, 2025

    Beyond the Gaia-Borg Dichotomy: Imagining a Second Chance

    January 28, 2025

    Book Review: “The End of the Cow and Other Emerging Issues”

    January 28, 2025

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.