Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • 从女性需要支持到人人都需要支持 以因果分层分析推动中国职场的性别伙伴关系转型
    • Politics for Fragile Futures: Anticipation, Interdependence and the Responsibility of Imagination
    • Rethinking Policy Time
    • What Future Is This Lesson For?
    • From “Women Need Support” to “Everyone Needs Support”
    • From The Pedagogy Of Pain To A Pedagogy Of Possibility
    • Reimagining the Hemisphere
    • Fighting for Sacred Futures
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 3 March 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 4 June 2026
        • Vol. 31 No. 1 September 2026
      • 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 2 December 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 1 September 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 4 June 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Responsible & Ethical Use of AI
      • Notice of Publication Fee Implementation
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Editors (Perspectives)
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
        • War, Genocide and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • The Futures Studies Channel
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Articles and Essays»2006»Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006»Articles»Casual Layered Analysis as Pedagogy in Studies of Science and Technology

    Casual Layered Analysis as Pedagogy in Studies of Science and Technology

    by David Turnbull

    ABSTRACT

    Science and technology embody a number of key metaphors and at least one central myth, one that was articulated by a founder and champion of scientific method, Francis Bacon. Through the dissection and reconstruction of nature, a new technologically improved nature will be the inevitable result. Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) opens a pathway for students to understand how such a myth came into being and take hold, not so much as a matter of public imagination or belief, but as an unconscious, continuing commitment to science. CLA as pedagogy is not directed towards to establishing the truth or falsity of Baconian propositions, or to proselytise for another version of science or an alternative belief system, but rather to enable students to examine the pervasiveness of such underlying myths in contemporary technological settings (for example the classroom), and to create a critical distance from which to engage with science as myth rather than as a set of unquestionable and therefore unthought assumptions. The project is to create a bridge between the sciences and the humanities, a place where dialogue might occur.

    View PDF

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • New Work, Old Inequalities: A Feminist Deconstruction of the Image of the Future of New Work
    • Politics for Fragile Futures: Anticipation, Interdependence and the Responsibility of Imagination
    • Special Relativity Theory Expands the Futures Cone’s Conceptualisation of the Futures and The Pasts
    • The Futures Cone Reimagined: A Framework for Critical and Plural Futures Thinking
    • Whose Futures Are Being Taught? A Critical Systematic Review of Futures Thinking in Education
    • Conflicts on the Rise – Is Anticipatory Governance a Solution?
    • Challenging Human Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa: Reconstructing the Narrative of Human Trafficking for the Creation of a More Enabling Environment in 2037
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Surfacing Vulnerabilities, Mapping Governance Futures and Anticipating Policy Pathways
    In-Press

    Unbundling researcher development: Narrative sensemaking through myth and metaphor

    October 21, 2026

    Article Marianne Engelbrecht¹*, Lessing Labuschagne² ¹ Researcher Development Academy, Department of Research, Innovation and Commercialisation,…

    Whose Futures Are Being Taught? A Critical Systematic Review of Futures Thinking in Education

    October 21, 2026

    The Becoming of Selves

    October 9, 2026

    Curating Public Futures: Local Knowledge, Cultural Sustainability, and Anticipatory Governance—A Case of the “Futures City Museum Project”

    September 13, 2026

    The Sixth Wave Reframed: Technological Convergence and Causal Layered Analysis

    August 9, 2026

    Can a Mosaic Become a Method? A Review of Our World of Futures Studies as a Mosaic: Part 1

    August 9, 2026

    Language Education Futures in Europe: A Causal Layered Analysis of Teachers’ Perspectives

    August 9, 2026

    Liquid Retirement: Navigating Identity Fluidity in the Transition from Career to Post-Work Life

    July 22, 2026

    Imagination and Futures Studies in Education

    July 22, 2026

    Wastewater in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA): A Resource for Water, Energy and Food Security in 2030

    July 22, 2026

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.