Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • 从女性需要支持到人人都需要支持 以因果分层分析推动中国职场的性别伙伴关系转型
    • Politics for Fragile Futures: Anticipation, Interdependence and the Responsibility of Imagination
    • Rethinking Policy Time
    • What Future Is This Lesson For?
    • From “Women Need Support” to “Everyone Needs Support”
    • From The Pedagogy Of Pain To A Pedagogy Of Possibility
    • Reimagining the Hemisphere
    • Fighting for Sacred Futures
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 3 March 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 4 June 2026
        • Vol. 31 No. 1 September 2026
      • 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 2 December 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 1 September 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 4 June 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Responsible & Ethical Use of AI
      • Notice of Publication Fee Implementation
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Editors (Perspectives)
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
        • War, Genocide and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • The Futures Studies Channel
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Articles and Essays»2010»Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010»Essays»Scared of Our Own Shadow? The Burka as A Metaphorical Mirror for Imperious Culture

    Scared of Our Own Shadow? The Burka as A Metaphorical Mirror for Imperious Culture

    by Anthony Judge

    ABSTRACT

    This paper explores the recent focus on the challenge to French cultural identity by women there wearing the full-body burka (burkha, burqa)i. a garment obscuring any view of the face in public. The question is complicated by issues including the right to personal choice in clothing, differing understandings of public decency and the possible effects on identification for security purposes. As a case study, the response to the burka provides an excellent example of applying binary logic to a multidimensional complex of psychosocial issues related to deeper understandings of identity. The case is noteworthy both for collapsing distinctions significant to such understanding and for its responsiveness to the extremes of passing fashion, but in the name of values acclaimed as fundamental. As such it embodies the extremism it abhors. This relies on exploiting the confusion of terms and thinking associated with the face and the facile in relation to the challenge of necessary diversity in a global society threatened by various forms of imperialism. The burka is also explored as a metaphor mirroring several problematic features of western society.

    View PDF

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • New Work, Old Inequalities: A Feminist Deconstruction of the Image of the Future of New Work
    • Politics for Fragile Futures: Anticipation, Interdependence and the Responsibility of Imagination
    • Special Relativity Theory Expands the Futures Cone’s Conceptualisation of the Futures and The Pasts
    • The Futures Cone Reimagined: A Framework for Critical and Plural Futures Thinking
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Foresight Maturity Model (FMM): Achieving Best Practices in the Foresight Field
    • Jose Rizal: Precursor of Futures Thinking in the Philippines
    • Conflicts on the Rise – Is Anticipatory Governance a Solution?
    • Whose Futures Are Being Taught? A Critical Systematic Review of Futures Thinking in Education
    In-Press

    Unbundling researcher development: Narrative sensemaking through myth and metaphor

    October 21, 2026

    Article Marianne Engelbrecht¹*, Lessing Labuschagne² ¹ Researcher Development Academy, Department of Research, Innovation and Commercialisation,…

    Whose Futures Are Being Taught? A Critical Systematic Review of Futures Thinking in Education

    October 21, 2026

    The Becoming of Selves

    October 9, 2026

    Curating Public Futures: Local Knowledge, Cultural Sustainability, and Anticipatory Governance—A Case of the “Futures City Museum Project”

    September 13, 2026

    The Sixth Wave Reframed: Technological Convergence and Causal Layered Analysis

    August 9, 2026

    Can a Mosaic Become a Method? A Review of Our World of Futures Studies as a Mosaic: Part 1

    August 9, 2026

    Language Education Futures in Europe: A Causal Layered Analysis of Teachers’ Perspectives

    August 9, 2026

    Liquid Retirement: Navigating Identity Fluidity in the Transition from Career to Post-Work Life

    July 22, 2026

    Imagination and Futures Studies in Education

    July 22, 2026

    Wastewater in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA): A Resource for Water, Energy and Food Security in 2030

    July 22, 2026

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.