Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • From Mirage to Wellspring
    • Surfacing Vulnerabilities, Mapping Governance Futures and Anticipating Policy Pathways
    • Metaphors for Reimagined Futures
    • Hope Theory for Alternative Futures
    • Urban-Rural Polarization in Canada
    • Confronting the Anti-Futures Triangle
    • Symposium: War, Genocide, and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • Foreword: Editorial Statement On the Necessity of Critique
    Journal of Futures Studies
    • Who we are
      • Editorial Board
      • Editors
      • Core Team
      • Digital Editing Team
      • Consulting Editors
      • Indexing, Rank and Impact Factor
      • Statement of Open Access
    • Articles and Essays
      • In Press
      • 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 3 March 2026
        • Vol. 30 No. 4 June 2026
      • 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 2 December 2025
        • Vol. 30 No. 1 September 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 4 June 2025
        • Vol. 29 No. 3 March 2025
      • 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 2 December 2024
        • Vol. 29 No. 1 September 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 4 June 2024
        • Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024
      • 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 2 December 2023
        • Vol. 28 No. 1 September 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 4 June 2023
        • Vol. 27 No. 3 March 2023
      • 2022
        • Vol. 27 No. 2 December 2022
        • Vol. 27 No.1 September 2022
        • Vol.26 No.4 June 2022
        • Vol.26 No.3 March 2022
      • 2021
        • Vol.26 No.2 December 2021
        • Vol.26 No.1 September 2021
        • Vol.25 No.4 June 2021
        • Vol.25 No.3 March 2021
      • 2020
        • Vol.25 No.2 December 2020
        • Vol.25 No.1 September 2020
        • Vol.24 No.4 June 2020
        • Vol.24 No.3 March 2020
      • 2019
        • Vol.24 No.2 December 2019
        • Vol.24 No.1 September 2019
        • Vol.23 No.4 June 2019
        • Vol.23 No.3 March 2019
      • 2018
        • Vol.23 No.2 Dec. 2018
        • Vol.23 No.1 Sept. 2018
        • Vol.22 No.4 June 2018
        • Vol.22 No.3 March 2018
      • 2017
        • Vol.22 No.2 December 2017
        • Vol.22 No.1 September 2017
        • Vol.21 No.4 June 2017
        • Vol.21 No.3 Mar 2017
      • 2016
        • Vol.21 No.2 Dec 2016
        • Vol.21 No.1 Sep 2016
        • Vol.20 No.4 June.2016
        • Vol.20 No.3 March.2016
      • 2015
        • Vol.20 No.2 Dec.2015
        • Vol.20 No.1 Sept.2015
        • Vol.19 No.4 June.2015
        • Vol.19 No.3 Mar.2015
      • 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 2 Dec. 2014
        • Vol. 19 No. 1 Sept. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 4 Jun. 2014
        • Vol. 18 No. 3 Mar. 2014
      • 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 2 Dec. 2013
        • Vol. 18 No. 1 Sept. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 4 Jun. 2013
        • Vol. 17 No. 3 Mar. 2013
      • 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 2 Dec. 2012
        • Vol. 17 No. 1 Sept. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 4 Jun. 2012
        • Vol. 16 No. 3 Mar. 2012
      • 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 2 Dec. 2011
        • Vol. 16 No. 1 Sept. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 4 Jun. 2011
        • Vol. 15 No. 3 Mar. 2011
      • 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 2 Dec. 2010
        • Vol. 15 No. 1 Sept. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 4 Jun. 2010
        • Vol. 14 No. 3 Mar. 2010
      • 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 2 Nov. 2009
        • Vol. 14 No. 1 Aug. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 4 May. 2009
        • Vol. 13 No. 3 Feb. 2009
      • 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 2 Nov. 2008
        • Vol. 13 No. 1 Aug. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 4 May. 2008
        • Vol. 12 No. 3 Feb. 2008
      • 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 2 Nov. 2007
        • Vol. 12 No. 1 Aug. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 4 May. 2007
        • Vol. 11 No. 3 Feb. 2007
      • 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 2 Nov. 2006
        • Vol. 11 No. 1 Aug. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 4 May. 2006
        • Vol. 10 No. 3 Feb. 2006
      • 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 2 Nov. 2005
        • Vol. 10 No. 1 Aug. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 4 May. 2005
        • Vol. 9 No. 3 Feb. 2005
      • 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 2 Nov. 2004
        • Vol. 9 No. 1 Aug. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 4 May. 2004
        • Vol. 8 No. 3 Feb. 2004
      • 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 2 Nov. 2003
        • Vol. 8 No. 1 Aug. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 4 May. 2003
        • Vol. 7 No. 3 Feb. 2003
      • 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.2 Dec. 2002
        • Vol. 7 No.1 Aug. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.4 May. 2002
        • Vol. 6 No.3 Feb. 2002
      • 2001
        • Vol.6 No.2 Nov. 2001
        • Vol.6 No.1 Aug. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.4 May. 2001
        • Vol.5 No.3 Feb. 2001
      • 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 2 Nov. 2000
        • Vol. 5 No. 1 Aug. 2000
        • Vol. 4 No. 2 May. 2000
      • 1999
        • Vol. 4 No. 1 Nov. 1999
        • Vol. 3 No. 2 May
      • 1998
        • Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1998
        • Vol. 2 No. 2 May. 1998
      • 1997
        • Vol. 2 No. 1 November 1997
        • Vol. 1 No. 2 May. 1997
      • 1996
        • Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1996
    • Information
      • Submission Guidelines
      • Publication Process
      • Responsible & Ethical Use of AI
      • Notice of Publication Fee Implementation
      • Submit a Work
      • JFS Premium Service
      • Electronic Newsletter
      • Contact us
    • Topics
    • Authors
    • Perspectives
      • About Perspectives
      • Podcast
      • Multi-lingual
      • Exhibits
        • When is Wakanda
      • Special Issues and Symposia
        • The Hesitant Feminist’s Guide to the Future: A Symposium
        • The Internet, Epistemological Crisis And The Realities Of The Future
        • Gaming the Futures Symposium 2016
        • Virtual Symposium on Reimagining Politics After the Election of Trump
        • War, Genocide and Futures Beyond US Hegemony
    • The Futures Studies Channel
      • About Us
      • Teaching Resources
        • High School
          • Futures Studies for High School in Taiwan
        • University
          • Adults
    Journal of Futures Studies
    Home»Articles and Essays»2024»Vol. 28 No. 3 March 2024»Book Review: Developing Third-Generation Learning Organizations: A Heuristic Discovery Process (2023)

    Book Review: Developing Third-Generation Learning Organizations: A Heuristic Discovery Process (2023)

    Review

    [Journal Version]

    Book Authors: Kazimierz Gozdz & Ruth-Ellen L. Miller

    Oliver Markley
    Professor Emeritus and former Chair, Graduate Program in Studies of the Future, University of Houston-Clear Lake; 181st Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002

    VUCA – an acronym for volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity – is a meme summarizing the challenging conditions increasingly facing leaders in all sectors of society. Developing Third-Generation Learning Organizations: A Heuristic Discovery Process (2023), by Kazimierz Gozdz, PhD and Ruth-Ellen L. Miller, PhD., is a new book focusing on how to handle such challenges with new ways of convening for work.

    As these authors point out, organizational cultures are a microcosm of the larger culture, and both must be transformed to deal with (or, as they put it, “thrive in spite of”) the disruptions of the emerging business, and global, environment.

    Integrating understandings in fields ranging from anthropology to cybernetics, from learning theory to applied metaphysics and transpersonal psychology, the authors have laid out a set of processes and a framework for organizational transformation, with case examples of its application, that could well be a model for the larger culture transformation that is emerging.  In doing this, they offer an alternative paradigm to business audiences wishing to go beyond yesterday’s obsolescent approaches.

    The practices they offer merge Peck’s (1993) community-building, Bohmian (1996) dialogue, Vygotsky-style (1978) scaffolding, and Wilber’s (1986) integral vertical development, with traditional financial analysis and performance measures – in an ongoing “organic framework, not a linear formula,” that can be seen as describing some of what is happening in grass roots movements around the world.

    Developing Third-Generation Learning Organizations weighs in at 217 pages and is priced at £72.99.  Thus, a goal of this review is not only to inform readers about the contributions this book makes, but to give readers enough of a feel about its content and style to make informed decisions whether to buy it.

    Toward that end, the book’s Table of Contents is appended as Figure 1 at the end of this review, and I highly recommend reading the 14 page Foreword, available for free by clicking the “View Extract” button at https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-9449-4. This foreword is especially useful, due to both the way it sets forth the historical foundations of the authors’ thinking, and to the way it exemplifies the authors’ readable writing style.

    Things I especially like and/or find useful about this book include:

    • The very detailed Table of Contents (appended as Figure 1), that makes it much easier to navigate the book.
    • The relatively long section in the book’s front matter that can be read for free on the publisher’s website.
    • The way the book uses the meme of Heuristic Discovery as a powerful organizing rubric.
    • The way the book integrates the transcendental ethos of transpersonal psychology and whole-systems dynamics with that of the currently dominant ethos of scientistic materialism.
    • The various step by step outlines on how to transform organizations from “top-down” management to developmental learning organizations.
    • The premise of “Nothing Extra” as the keynote of using the actual workplace as a learning laboratory where business leaders proactively and deliberately utilize work to enhance human development.
    • The case studies that allow the reader to readily imagine the recommendations of the book being implemented by clients/client organizations.
    • How this book could enable and help format a desired future for social, governmental, and business systems facing the rapidly changing (VUCA) environment we are encountering.

    Most importantly, the book demonstrates that organizations can be designed, governed, and led to enhance, rather than reduce, human consciousness and development at a time when such development is absolutely essential.

    However, I find it difficult to imagine – if I was a managing executive and read this book to resolve the pressing problems I am faced with – how I would actually operationalize what the book recommends without hiring Gozdz and company as a consultant? Obviously, this is a not-so hidden agenda of the book, and Part Four of the book comprises five chapters detailing successful case examples of this style of consulting in practice.

    Examples of Gozdz’ results have been described by other writers, notably Kegan and Lacey (2016) in An Everyone Culture, and Jaworsky (2012) in Source: The Inner Path of Knowledge Creation; but this book provides the first published explication of the theory and methodology on which Gozdz’ and Miller’s work is based. So, perhaps, this is a text for not only academics and their students who are interested in theory and methodology; but also, the many professionals who observed the actual development and implementation of these ideas.  For such readers, this book is a well annotated, clearly written description of the development of the ideas underpinning the authors’ approach.  That may explain the relatively abstract level of writing, with few concrete examples until Part Four.

    Sadly, the cost of the printed edition of the book makes it something that I fear only a few people will read. I hope the authors may find ways to provide low-cost alternative formats – e.g., pdf or Kindle – as this book contains a really important set of ideas for human society at this time, and important to become widely recognized and adopted.

    In summary, our world beset by ongoing VUCA-like change, and what Gozdz and Miller offer is a framework for choosing processes and creating structures that have the flexibility and adaptability that may, indeed, make it possible for both companies and the larger society to thrive in the chaotic times that lay ahead.

    References

    Bohm, David. (1996). On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.

    Gozdz, Kazimierz and Miller, Ruth-Ellen. (2023). Developing Third-Generation Learning Organizations: A Heuristic Discovery Process.  Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Jaworski, Joseph. (2012). Source: The Inner Path of Knowledge Creation. New York: Berrett-Koehler.

    Kegan, Robert and Lacey, Linda. (2016). An Everyone Culture. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Peck, M. Scott. (1993). A World Waiting to Be Born: Rediscovering Civility. New York: Bantam Books.

    Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in Society, the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Wilber, Ken, Brown, Daniel, et al. (1986). Transformations Of Consciousness: Conventional and Contemplative Perspectives on Development. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.

    Top Posts & Pages
    • Homepage
    • Weaving Threads of Hope as Feminizing Futures
    • Imagination and Futures Studies in Education
    • Applied Critical Futures Studies: Stance Before Method
    • Vol. 30 No. 3 March 2026
    • Vol. 30 No. 4 June 2026
    • Towards an Explicit Research Methodology: Adapting Research Onion Model for Futures Studies
    • Emotional States, Mental Imagery, and Scenario Workshop Outcomes: Implications for Futures Practice
    • Special Relativity Theory Expands the Futures Cone’s Conceptualisation of the Futures and The Pasts
    • Articles by Topic
    In-Press

    Liquid Retirement: Navigating Identity Fluidity in the Transition from Career to Post-Work Life

    July 22, 2026

    Article Shu-Chin Fu1, Kuo-Hua Chen2,* 1 Department of Education and Future Design, Doctoral Program in…

    Imagination and Futures Studies in Education

    July 22, 2026

    Wastewater in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA): A Resource for Water, Energy and Food Security in 2030

    July 22, 2026

    Co-Creating the Future with AI: From Input to Ownership in Participative Scenario Generation

    July 22, 2026

    Intergenerational Adequacy and Humane Futures: A Capability–Conversion Architecture for Long-Term Justice

    July 4, 2026

    Applied Critical Futures Studies: Stance Before Method

    July 4, 2026

    Futures in Tension: Foresight and the Limits of Government Strategy in Latin America

    July 4, 2026

    Anticipating Ecuador’s Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Insights to 2040

    July 4, 2026

    Emotional States, Mental Imagery, and Scenario Workshop Outcomes: Implications for Futures Practice

    July 4, 2026

    From Lazarus to Leviathan: A foresight analysis of North Korea’s cyber operations and its implications

    June 29, 2026

    The Journal of Futures Studies,

    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies

    Tamkang University

    Taipei, Taiwan 251

    Tel: 886 2-2621-5656 ext. 3001

    Fax: 886 2-2629-6440

    ISSN 1027-6084

    Tamkang University
    Graduate Institute of Futures Studies
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.